86
So at this point in my life, the Summer of Nineteen Ninety-one,
nearing the end of my twenty-sixth year, I had survived two
conspiracies out to get me. Yes, I realize that using the term
'conspiracies out to get me' is a no-no in a psychological context
when discussing one's life. And yet what am I to make of it?
In both cases, I hadn't suspected the machinations happening behind
my back until one person too many had been roped into the 'plot'. In
the case of my high school math teacher, he had been incensed by what
had been going on and told me about what the school district had been
doing to me behind my back and recommended I let my father know and
sue the school district. In the case of my first woman doctor, she
had been so enthralled by the 'plot' that she felt the need to
publicly notify the county social services about it. I never
suspected that there were people out to get me, I was told.
Four times in fact when you toss in the time my high school
friend Van confessed to me years after the fact that my final high
school math teacher had rolled me out of his class by merely marking
the correct answers on my math tests as 'wrong'. And the most recent
example with my doctor at the Premier Medical Center telling me of
the threats against Betsey for treating me.
The classic view of a conspiracy seems to go back to the
assassination of Julius Caesar, where a number of underlings gather
together to discuss the plans, agree on them, and then carry them
out. I'm here to propose another, if not more common way, that
conspiracies form. It's one guy covering his ass with friends who
don't want to see him get in trouble.
Yes. It's often simply that.
In the case of my childhood years, teachers had been reporting to the
school district that I stuttered and needed help. As the school
district was legally bound to do so, but didn't want to spend the
money, they came up with this 'test' for me. I've told this story
before, but now let's see it in a new light. I was called to the
nurse's office at the start of fourth grade where a group of district
people were gathered around a small table. I was told to come in and
sit at the table and read a page out of a book about the creation of
Disney World. Being a habitual stutterer,
not a nervous stutter, my mind was distracted by the strange
environment and thus I didn't stutter as I read the page. The people
assembled there seemed pleased and I was sent on my way while they
agreed amongst themselves that I didn't need speech therapy. And I
likely returned to the familiar fourth grade class room and stuttered
up a storm when talking about common daily matters. The fourth grade
teacher was frustrated when she heard that I wasn't going to receive
speech therapy as it was obvious to her I had a problem and so the
school district decided to cover their ass by having me assigned to
the existing pull-out group. Even though nothing the group did,
essentially play children's Scrabble
a few times each week, addressed my stuttering in the least, it
made the fourth grade teacher feel I was being helped and thus
she never looked into whether or not I was actually being
helped.
As the years went on and more teachers reported to the district that
I needed speech therapy, the district would find new ways not to deal
with it such as removing me from a class I was doing well at, but as 'Latin' was an elective class, taking me out of it ended the teacher's
official ability to demand I get help. I grew up in this school
environment with all my class mates knowing I stuttered as well as most of
the on-site staff, but since a group of district officials had once
heard me read a page in fourth grade without stuttering,
'Officially', I didn't stutter and thus 'didn't need help'. And yet,
when my grades suffered from my problems writing by hand, it was
apparently that same stuttering that was pointed to 'showing' that I
was mentally challenged and that was why I was falling behind in
those classes requiring the most hand written work. If my actual
I.Q. score at the time refuted that assumption, then it could be
easily over looked and my 'real I.Q.' presumed to be so low to the
point that my high school guidance counselor wouldn't even consider
me for college options despite my high academic performance of the
previous years. When he discovered that my factual I.Q. was well
above my presumed I.Q., rather than raising alarm bells, he
just went along with the way the school district had been treating my
needs in years past, unconsciously adding his own name to the list of
conspirators who had been denying me my educational fulfillment in
childhood. Step by step, more people were involved in the
justifications for my not getting the help legally prescribed for me,
and one by one the conspiracy was formed even though they would all
claim that there hadn't been one since they all hadn't
met in a room before hand to agree to it. They had just joined
it as it went along.
Such, too, had my medical care been denied me. The first doctor to
address my declining adult health, the joint doctor, rather than
admit to himself that he didn't have a clue what was causing it, he
imagined me to be a morphine addict trying to trick him into giving
me my next fix. Even though I had never had any morphine in my
life, that fact wasn't going to stand in his way of dropping me
as his patient based on that unsubstantiated theory. When my
mother's primary care doctor 'performed a physical on me' and
apparently lost his mind as a result, he entered a world where I
couldn't have any real health issues to the point that he was
discarding any test result or records that didn't confirm his
imaginings. He then comforted himself by creating narrative reports
detailing what he had wanted those test results to have said.
When I then went to the local gastroenterologist, Dr. Tanaka, about
my weight loss, despite having two objective tests showing I had a
fat malabsorbtion problem in his hands, he didn't want to face that
his colleagues could have been wrong about me and concluded that the
test results must be false, coming up with at least one theory
as to how I might have tampered with the tests. If anyone questioned
his conclusion to ignore said results, he could have easily pointed
to one doctor who was claiming I couldn't possibly have had real
medical issues and another doctor who had labeled me as a faker of
health problems. To each console their consciences, they could
discuss me amongst themselves creating new imagined 'insights' as to
why I should be ignored and denigrated by medical circles.
Talking to one or more of these past doctors, my first woman doctor,
rather than confirm for herself the basis for these stories, felt
so compelled by them that she willingly added her name to the
'conspiracy out to get me' by writing a letter notifying the county's
social services office that I
was, not that she had heard, I was a
lifelong welfare fraud and I had seen dozens of doctors who all
agreed on this, though when she was under oath she suddenly
couldn't remember the name of a single one of them. Still, one
by one, as each medical professional found it easier to believe the
false stories about me rather than look into my health issues, they
each unconsciously added their names to the group denying me medical
care over a period of years. After all, they were just supporting
their peers, whereas I was not one of them. Any medical
professional who did take my health issues seriously was a threat to
this group and their imagined authority over the facts of my medical
history. These threats needed to be either coerced into adding their
name to the 'conspiracy', or rejected from the medical community in
order to keep what it wanted to believe about me pure from any
contradictory findings.
While not as quickly run out of the state as Betsey was, the
neurologist who discovered my bulging spinal disc, Dr. Robins, and
the neuro-psychologist who had affirmed my first stroke and the
impact of my health issues on my cognitive scores, Dr. Maverick, were
eventually gone from the city within a few years. In the case of Dr.
Maverick she was later found verbally denying her written findings
supporting me and settled into a new practice elsewhere in the state.
What do you think of this alternative theory of how
conspiracies form?
Does it seem plausible to you? Can you think of other examples
from your own life or the lives of people you know?
Have you ever added your own name?